• Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    ooOOOOooooo! Someone is behind on their protection money!

    FTC: Uber, you have fine print and use dark patterns! Bad!

    All other tech companies: Whistling intensifies

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Ehh, the process of canceling UO involves 1) being at least 48h before your next renewal, which is mentioned nowhere except the cancelation flow, and 2) contacting cs and going through retention bullshit. VS the sign-up process being two presses.

      Don’t let ‘good’ be the enemy of ‘perfect’, or whatevet that saying is.

      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Sorry, I forgot this: /s

        I’ve sent so many letters to my state’s attorney general over Amazon signing me up for subscriptions without notice and authorization.

        It’s just a cost of business for them.

          • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            If anyone in my household clicked a thumbnail of a video provider through Prime Video on the TV, it would auto-enroll into a limited free trial, then renew as a subscription. There was no notification to the viewer of this behavior, and no authorization/approval from the cardholder.

            My recourse has been to go into an obscure corner of my account to cancel after every erroneous click. (I know of the PIN thing, but that’s a headache for everyone; it should be a pin to purchase, not forced for all users.)

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Very, very optimistic of you to assume this isn’t just retaliation for something, or because Musk is planning some new rideshare company/arm of Tesla.

        • BarrierWithAshes@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Well the Facebook and Google antitrust lawsuits have both been going since the Biden administration and Zuckerberg was at the inauguration and that lawsuit hasn’t been stopped yet. Maybe the FTC still has some power? Or DOGE forgot about them (lol no) or DOGE just hasnt gotten to them yet.

          I doubt well see the FTC sue Tesla anytime soon but if they can work on some of these other tech giants I welcome it.

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I believe at least one of the anti-trust lawsuits Google lost was brought by the previous Trump Administration.

  • Audacious@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Really surprised the current government regime actually cares about this, because it’s about scamming the populace.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    muskrat still has that hallucination that everybody’s gonna be riding around in fully-autonomous self-driving teslas, right? so that’d mean this case will be ‘‘allowed’’ to proceed.

  • Magnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    THAT’S what they came up with? The company that used to have a giant panic button that would wipe their entire building’s hard dives for FBI raids and the FTC drums up charges on, checks notes, a predatory subscription.