• kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    When the far right came knocking, Harvard made Columbia look pretty cowardly and unworthy of any prestige. Columbia should lose its “ivy league” title for good.

    Good for Harvard leadership.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Their pressure seems to have helped Harvard President Alan Garber stand up to Trump

    No: what helps Harvard stand up to Trump is that Harvard is loaded. The University of Bumfuck Nowhere will immediately cave in to Trump’s authoritarian nonsense to maintain their federal funding and their tax-exempt status. Harvard can afford to do without them.

    In other words, I’m glad Harvard is resisting. But this is yet another example of rich-man-can-do.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Is the better option that rich man do nothing?

      You’re not wrong that the money helps but someone also has to do the convincing part. They both help.

      • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I agree. It’s just that resistance should be uplifting, and seeing that, once again, only the rich have the means to resist is depressing AF.

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I believe those with more resources have more options to resist; this has always been the case. However, they don’t have all of the means.

          I don’t think doomerism like this does anything but demoralize. It’s better than them going along with the bullshit. It’s gotta start somewhere, and it’s going to start with those who have the resources to resist.

          • courageousstep@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I think that it’s similar to the idea that anti-racism needs to start with white people.

            White people have the social capital to stay safe while protesting—thus able to further the cause for longer—and the subjugation starts with white people so they have a responsibility to start the movement.

            Rich people have the economic capital to stay safe while protesting—thus able to further the cause for longer—and the subjugation originates with rich people so they have a responsibility to start the movement.