If your adversary says you better not do something, you should probably heavily consider doing it.

They probably asked him something like “Did you use an official checkpoint to get into the US from Mexico?” And he said “No” because he didn’t enter at all, but they interpreted it as he crossed illegally.

That the system sucks doesn’t absolve people from the choices they make when they have the opportunity. People who chose to not vote passively supported whomever won, thus Trump. Everyone who chose not to vote is culpable for the suffering the administration causes, aids or allows.

It was a trolley problem, anyone claiming that washing their hands of the decision means they bear no responsibility for the results is deluding themselves.

It even doesn’t makes sense if you’re a single issue voter on genocide. There are only 3 possibilities:

1. Thryet Believe Trump would support it less, they should vote for Trump, as that would reduce it.
2. They Believe both support it about the same, they should vote based the 2nd/3rd/etc issue, because you can’t impact you first, so you should impact something else you care about.
3. They Believe Harris would support it less, they should vote for Harris, as that would reduce it.

There wasn’t anyone most people were ok with, but that doesn’t mean one of them wasn’t significantly more horrifying.

Yeah, I was quite literally shouting in the car by myself listening to that one. Felt like he was saying the quiet part out loud, they just want people to feel like they’re doing something good, and whatever they actually accomplish doesn’t matter.