snooggums

This is the only federated software that I use because it is the only one in a format I enjoy using. I liked reddit for the threaded forum kinda format, so lemmy was an easy transition.

Never liked facebook/twitter/instagram or those formats so no interest in a federated version of them. There could be something out there I would also like, but thst would require trying more things and I gave up after bouncing off a few.

This skin was grown yes. On a human body. That is mine.

This robot believes in ownership of humans confirmed. Don’t fall for the weasel words!

To be fair, sometimes instead of beating them up they shoot them.

Better slap a “safety” on there to show the administration is thinking about children.

…thinking about children’s safety. Yeah, that’s the ticket.

Yes, that could be a third option.

Clearly the QA should have ordered a &#%@*

Big sounds like an unreasonably large amount of hi res textures most people won’t ever use.

All the pope had to do to live was say thank you, but he didn’t.

If nothing else he would send all the pedo preists to hell.

Cash payment for her latest crushing video.

Painting out these movie mistakes as part of a restoration is wrong. What’s in the movie is in the movie, and altering the movie to this extent is a form of revisionist history. Cinema is worse off when over-aggressive restorations alter the action within the frame. To me, this is equivalent to swapping out an actor’s performance with a different take, or changing the music score during an action sequence, or replacing a puppet creature with a computer graphics version of the same creature decades after release. Movies are a moment in time. But I digress.

I disagree strongly with this comparison. Yes, having a verion that is accurate to the theatrical release available is an important part of movie history. But director’s and other alternate cuts can be superior to the theatrical release and fixing special effects or errors on post to remove distractions on older movies is comparable to digitally editing them out before release for a modern movie. Cleaning up potentially distracting mistakes is not in any way comparable to changing a performance.

Adding new stuff like having Greedo shoot is comparable, because it changes characters. Digitally fixing a license plate falling off during a take is not.

More like continuous and never ending. It is fucking exhausting.

I heard cats have a self cleaning cycle.

You completely glossed over the small, agile part.

A drone can do a fucking barrel roll with zero impact on its flight capabilities or passengers. Have fun with passengers when an automated passenger drone needs to quickly change thrust direction because of wind shear.

Yes, it contradicts itself within the next couple of sentences.

Non-AI results are not going to generally include sites about how something isn’t true unless it is a common misconception.

As a comparison I ran the same all lower case query in bing and got the answer about the movie because asking about a movie is statistically more likely than asking if a human is in heat. Google’a ai is worse than fucking bing, while google’s old serach algorith consistently had the right answers.

Google made itself worse by replacing a working system with ai.

Drone swarms are groups of small, agile devices with no passengers.

That is one of the many problems, yes.

So yeah, if you ignore the parts that make it more complicated it seems easier!

If it is windy, it is far more complicated than driving on the road, especially in cities with taller buildings. Like not crashing into buildings is far harder than applying the brakes when there is ever changing wind shear that you can’t see. This applies to most days in most cities.