• DrDickHandler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      I don’t know on which community we currently are, but this is the most accurate depiction of what’s actually going on. Democrats serve the corporate elite and don’t really bother turning it left.

  • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I would still take blocking progress to the left over concentration camps every time

    So yeah, if you think bith sides are the same, then I guess it doesnt matter who won. We probably would be here with tarrifs and camps and a dictatorship, but just with Harris.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      I would still take blocking progress to the left over concentration camps every time

      Um, blocking progress to the left was a major step in creating the concentration camps. That’s how it works, my friend. We’ve been saying this for several decades. Maybe one of these days the message will get through… Not today, though.

      • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 minutes ago

        It will probably get through as me and my friends are in camps thinking that at least this would have happened with Harris anyways. Im sure she was all about getting rid of due process and shipping citizens to El Salvador.

        But its cool. You guys are gonna have that revolution any day now. I hear theres all sorts of plans already.

        Edit: In fact, lets just go back to the image

        Dems block going left

        Repubs ratchet to the right

        So when the republicans dont have power, do the dems do it for them? I mean I know they dont do enough to stop them. No disagreements. But if we never elected a republican in office again, and they never had either of the 3 branches, and they didnt control any state, we would still be going right.

        Im not asking would they still block us going left

        But do you think we would stop progressing as a country?

        Cause going through hundreds of years, theres actual quite a few things we actually have progressed with. Like look at us in the queer community. When I was graduating high school in 08, I thought we were still so much further out from same sex marriage. And then once people focused on trans people, I thought we were still even further out from the dems helping them.

        But yet over time they did move forward. Dont Ask Dont Tell was still dog shit. But it was something. Then it became queer people were allowed in. Period.

        So even just in my life and my community I have seen progress. Its slow. It is. Its painfully slow. But its progress

        So if we never had republicans in power we would suddenly stop that? Am I wrong about my community slowly becoming more and more accepted over the decades?

        Or does me just knowing my communities history and celebrating where we have gotten make me a liberal?

  • Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I empathize a bit, but it’s not like democrats haven’t been getting more leftward either.

    The truth is though that ultimately, politicians are gonna be malleable to those who are going to vote, both because of the very simple “if I focus here, I will be more likely to get the most votes while providing due change”, but also because the idea of democracy is based in the trust that publics will emerge to voice their concerns to the politicians.

    Most politicians are just not online enough to gather the discourse that we would be experiencing, and also there’s the whole issue of not knowing how much of it is foreign interference in a trench-suit pretending to be the voices of the locals. That’s why direct calls to voicing these concerns to local politicians, and being willing to hear them out as much as they hear you out matters a lot. Some do forget over the years, but a lot join politics because they genuinely want to make life better.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      I empathize a bit, but it’s not like democrats haven’t been getting more leftward either.

      The furthest left democrat with any sway is Bernie “Israel has a right to defend itself” Sanders.

      Most politicians are just not online enough to gather the discourse that we would be experiencing,

      I think you don’t have to be online to understand several incredibly acute contradictions that are mounting at the moment, between the horrible brutality of genocide in Gaza, concentration camps at the border that have been active since the Obama years in addition to CECOT and Guantanamo, the coming climate collapse, erosion of queer rights, and all manner of civil rights. These phenomena signify a movement of the entire capitalist ruling class, who wield empire in their hands, to the most extreme forms of violence. It’s a bipartisan affair. They aren’t carefully measuring public opinion, Joe Biden deliberately went out and confidently lied about Palestinians beheading Israeli babies while the IDF massacred the children of Gaza. There is no calculation of how to balance public concerns in that action, they only want to control you and brutalize the weakest among the oppressed people of the world, to consolidate power in uncertain times and weather the storm. If the public rejects the carrot, we get the stick and that’s Trump. They want you to be a good little peasant and go back to the carrot while they slaughter the people of the oppressed nations and the most marginalized minorities.

      Some do forget over the years, but a lot join politics because they genuinely want to make life better

      She’s only one woman, but she’s probably the most visible example of this myth. AOC is not a “bartender and community organizer turned political leader” she’s a Democratic Party plant who operated an LLC that received mysterious funding and became a prominent political figure out of nowhere. Obama has a similar legendary backstory as a “community organizer” but his family on his dad’s side has intelligence ties. I don’t think every single local politician is part of some crazy conspiracy, though, but you’re engaging in some level of magical thinking if you think the Democratic Party can somehow be run by well-meaning local leaders, in a world where the establishment can create an AOC to capture and redirect public sentiment very easily.

    • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      The truth is though that ultimately, politicians are gonna be malleable to those who are going to vote

      Literally not the truth; polls showed several times more voters wanted a ceasefire than who didn’t and Kamala still decided to go with wholeheartedly supporting the genocide.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      Oh no, I entirely disagree. The majority of Washington Democrats are right in the corporate center. They aren’t working to make life better for the average person. If they were, why didn’t they seriously push for universal healthcare, raising the minimum wage, or regulating big banks and other monopolies?

      (I know, you’re going to say the Republicans stopped them, but everyone who actually remembers when the Democrats had the majority knows better than that. But even if we’re mistaken, like our memories are entirely false, that would only show that the Democrats have the power to stop Trump right now, which they’re failing to do… Either excuse only goes to prove the aforementioned claim.)

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    48 minutes ago

    The two party system is bullshit, and the solution is electoral reform like ranked choice voting.

    One party, the Democratic party, usually (but not always) approves of such reform efforts.
    The other party, the Republican party, universally opposes such efforts with extreme fervor.

    So it makes sense to hate the two party system, but that system is one party’s fault in particular.

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    This is why revolution and working class organization is necessary.

    Also funny when people complain about Leftists critiquing the Dems. Pre-electiom you said to wait, now it’s post election and the same complaints arise.

    • Lemmynated@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Democrats commit genocide and post the🙏 emoji

      Republicans commit genocide and post the 🤣 emoji

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Soooo Dems won’t make it better but least won’t make it worse. If 2 party then easy choice.

    Shame people didnt do this 20 years ago and voted gop out of existence.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      No, my friend, you’re wrong. The Washington Democrats do make it worse. They (most of them) are willing participants in making life worse for the average American, and they know it, and they don’t care.

    • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      ???

      25 years ago the Democrats won the election against Bush and then Gore gave up. They personally handed the presidency over to the republicans. Democrats like to lose even when they win. Then 21 years ago the Dems ran on a platform of “we’ll kill Muslims more efficiently than the Republicans.”

      Democrats don’t want to win. Their primary purpose is to prevent a left from existing.

      Also don’t forget Nancy Pelosi’s statement about the country needing a “strong republican party” last year. These people are ghouls and aren’t to be trusted.

    • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The function of a ratchet is to make an object go in one direction more easily. Democrats fulfill a function in propeling the country rightward. This was arguably not true 80 years ago but post-Reagan they are part of a process of rightward movement. Voting for and legitimizing them is moving the country right and making things worse.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You need to zoom out. Imagine you’re looking back at this moment from 100 years in the future. If people said “the Dems won’t make it better but at least they won’t make it worse” and just kept the system going, do you think it will ever lead to progress? Will the whole system ever improve?

      You need to look for a solution outside of that system. Stop looking for lesser evils in the ballot box. First, look to the people immediately around you and try to join local organizations that might be directly working to improve their conditions (soup kitchens, women’s shelters, etc). Then, organize labor: figure out how to join a union, if there isn’t one read the IWW (or any other big union near you) manual on organizing your workplace and find support to start organizing your workplace. Then from there, your objective should be to take the workers’ struggle to the national and international stage. Change doesn’t come from the ballot box, it comes from building alternative power structures ourselves.

    • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The problem with having 365 million people or so in a sick society that encouraged and rewards destroying each other is that things get worse automatically.

      Dems doing nothing makes things worse. Reps doing nothing makes things worse. Its a prisoners dilemma where the only winning move is to kill the cops and hope for the best.

      If al gore won we’d have still invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, it would just be in bush jrs first term in 2004 that we invade Iraq.

  • 🏴 hamid the villain [he/him] 🏴@vegantheoryclub.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Dear Liberals,

    1. I am so glad I can’t see the bullshit from lemmy.world on my server

    2. Your economic system guarantees fascism. You can’t vote your way out of it. Capitalist modes of production inevitably concentrate power and lead to fascism. It is unavoidable.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      actually this time it’ll be different, we just won’t have another crisis of capitalism that requires the stamping out of revolutionaries

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “Both sides bad” is why we have Trump.

    Democrats took America from gays are illegal, to full gay rights with marriage. Environmental laws have been all Democrats. If Democrats did nothing, Trump wouldn’t have signed 76 executive orders reversing Biden orders on his very first day.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      Of course there was some good legislation along the way. Nobody is denying that. But the crisis we face now is there because the Democrats decided to ignore the danger. It really is that simple…

      You can start with Citizens United. You can talk about the Dems after 9/11, the illegal drone strikes, Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, how the Dems celebrated the human rights violations then, which leads us to El Salvador today. You can talk about stacking the courts, which was a plan publicly announced in the 90s, that the Dems never seriously tried to stop, leading to the current Supreme Court…

      If you want to say, “Well, the Dems are less evil,” then great, many people partly agree. But that’s not good enough. They fucked us all over by not stopping the Republicans from doing really horrible shit, even though we all knew what was coming. Maybe in a few years we can write on Biden’s tombstone “Not quite as evil as Trump.” Would that make anyone happy? Is that something to be proud of?

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Democrats took America from gays are illegal, to full gay rights with marriage.

      Gay marriage was legalized at the federal level by a conservative-leaning Supreme Court. The only time a Democrat acted on same-sex marriage nationally was when Bill Clinton banned it by signing DOMA in 1996.

      Environmental laws have been all Democrats.

      Nixon created the EPA.

      If Democrats did nothing, Trump wouldn’t have signed 76 executive orders reversing Biden orders on his very first day.

      If Democrats passed legislation, Biden’s achievements couldn’t be undone through executive order.

      The parties are not the same, especially now that one of them is openly fascist, but you’re giving Democrats credit for things they did not do. Also, the meme doesn’t say they’re the same, it describes the rachet effect, which is an accurate representation of how Democrats behaved on multiple issues. Look at how their economic policies have changed over the last 30 years, or how their views on immigration policies have changed since Trump was elected.

      • multifariace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Is there a political community you found on lemmy that understands how this works, like you do. I see way too many Democrat apologists on these popular communities.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Well, .world has a lot of users who understand this, but the loudest voices (who are often times moderators) are definitely Democrat apologists. Then again, some of the other instances, like .ml, have the opposite problem, and are full-blown tankie/authoritarian apologists, so it’s kind of a, “pick your poison, damned if you do, damned if you don’t,” situation.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Your list supporting Republicans means you must support Trump. right?

        I mean you can’t have it both ways. Nixon created the EPA, Nixon was Republican, therefore Republican policy is to put the environment first. That’s what you are arguing.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 hours ago

          That is absolutely not what I’m saying. I’m correcting objectively false claims you’re making; environmental laws were not all Democrats, the Democrats did not do anything at the federal level to pass, “full gay rights with marriage,” and the meme and OP did not say, “both sides bad.” Those points are a statement of fact, not an argument.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            If you have to go back 50 years to find an example of when Republicans were good for the environment, you proved my point.

            It’s no different than, “Republicans are the party of Lincoln!”

            • pjwestin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              44 minutes ago

              First reply: “Giving Nixon credit for the EPA means you support Republicans and therefore Trump.”

              Second reply: “NIxon was so long ago he doesn’t count.”

              You can’t have it both ways. You can’t claim pointing out a good thing Nixon did means I support modern Republicans while also claiming Nixon happened so long ago that he’s not connected to modern Republicans.

              It’s also just factually wrong to say, “it was so long ago, its like saying they’re the anti-slavery party.” Nixon represents the turning point for the Republican party, where they abandoned their support for Civil Rights and embraced the Southern Strategy. He’s basically the turning point for where the Republicans became the party we know today. He’s the reason it’s bullshit to point out Republicans are the party of Lincoln.

            • pjwestin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              If you’re talking about the Respect for Marriage Act, that was passed a decade after the Supreme Court established gay marriage as the law of the land. The overturning of Roe made Democrats decide that they should codify gay marriage, since they saw how badly failing to codify abortion rights turned out. It also reopens the door for Civil Unions and passed with large Republican support, so I wouldn’t exactly call it a huge win for Democrats.

              As for the EPA, I’m not sure what you’re talking about, but you are absolutely incorrect. Nixon proposed the EPA and NOAA through executive order, and it was later ratified by Congress. It’s possible you’re referencing some sort of dispute Nixon had with Congress on how they intended to create the EPA, but he absolutely supported it; it was his idea.

    • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      actually, your candidate running a dogshit campaign and telling everyone to the left of them to fuck off is why we have trump. we warned this would happen, too. anyone with a memory span longer than a pet goldfish remembers all of this.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Socially left on some issues and economically right on all issues isn’t left.

    • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No, the DNC is why we have trump. It’s on them.

      Obama wasn’t perfect at all, but his platform was at least change and progress. While he was originally against gay marriage he did listen to the public and change for re-election. If the DNC listened to the public instead of fighting against progress that would be great. But like… Biden was the throw away to conservatives for Obama’s VP to “balance out” Obama being progressive….And now he was their best idea on what to do for a better future? It’s pathetic, and demonstrates the above.

      No one is trying to say Biden was worse than trump. They’re saying the DNC is what even allowed trump to exist, by being greedy fucks who care more about their handlers than the American people and running the worst candidates they can. “Nothing will fundamentally change” is the dumbest, most “fuck you don’t bother to vote for me” fucking campaign I’ve ever heard.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Its fine let them keep losing. I honestly don’t care anymore. At some point progressives like Bernie, AOC, etc. will finally wake up & realize they don’t need Democrats to win. You want to see people passionate about voting again then it is time to leave the establishment behind. Anyone remember Bernie’s crowds in 2016? It was obvious he was may more popular than Clinton having to pay Beyonce & Jay Z for people to show up at her events.

        • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Bernie and AOC are sheepdogs for the Dems. They are all-in on the party. When people become disillusioned with Dems, they pop in to spread false hope and convince people to come back and believe in the Dems.

          It is true that the welfare state is popular and thar is basically what they are selling. The public wants healthcare, not the cruelty and expense of the capitalist extraction insurance industry. So Medicare for All sounds great in comparison. It’s very popular when actually explained to people.

          But it will never become policy without turmoil. The health insurance industry is a huge leech excreting profits for the owner class. Dems want to dangle it in front of voters but will never suppory it when in power, they will enginerr a Lieberman or parliamentarian because the party is completely beholden to capital, including insurance capital.

          I’m sure you agree with a lot of what I have said. I just want to emphasize that Bernie and AOC are not really outsiders, they are ineffectual refornists whose only current function - one that they embrace - is to keep people that hate the crimes of the Democratic Party, up to and including genocide, to keep voting for them.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          They absolutely, 1000% need Democrats to win. Maybe not their respective districts, but if they want to get anything done on a national level, they need about half the country on their side, and that includes Democrats.

          Now, they can certainly eat the party whole, the way the tea party and MAGA ate the GOP. That involves being more specific than “Democrats bad”. In fact, how did they do it? Did you ever see them telling people to abandon the Republican party?

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I understand where you’re coming from, but Democrats need progressives to win. If they leave Democrats, it will be Democrats that will follow them, not the other way around. I don’t think trying to emulate MAGA is such a great idea. I know there are lessons that can be learned there, but I am still confident that a new party with popular progressives & populist policies would do more than trying to change a broken party from within.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        No one is trying to say Biden was worse than trump.

        The meme isn’t that Biden was worse but that he did nothing. It’s proveably false. Trump himself proved it by criticizing Biden at inauguration and immediately undoing Biden’s orders.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If it was that easy to undo what biden did, then practically he did nothing.

          • thejml@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Much of what Trump has “undone” wasn’t undone legally. Many of the things he did requires congress to rollback and other things are caught up in courts. But in the mean time they happened so it will be potentially unable to be put back even if it is ordered so.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              So, again, practically meaningless distinction. Until democrats are willing to use the same tools they leave available to republicans, the democrats are ineffective.

              • thejml@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Thing is, they don’t have the same opportunities. The one reason why trump has been able to push things through in this shitty manner, is because the Republicans have stacked the Supreme Court (because the holes from people dying got filled while Republicans were in power) and they have majority control of Congress.

    • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      “Both sides bad” is why we have Trump.

      You have Trump because you have capitalism and the reactionary political class serves a purpose in it. Liberalism tells you to only think of politics in a vacuum: whatever the last election was and what the next election is. In this vacuum they limit the world of politics down to what the two capitalist parties promise for capital, which varies and triangulates over time. The GOP was originally a party of free states and slavery abolition and the Democrats slavers and Southern white racists. Look at how they shift over time, both parties existing now for over 120 years. If you only ever look at the previous and next 4 years of what the capitalist political duopoly gives you, you will never understand the currents or why your “good guys” are increasingly xenophobic and transphobic or how political choices are actually made, because it is not just every four years at a ballot box proxied through some weirdos in the electoral college.

      Anyways, both sides are bad. Have you already forgotten Biden’s genocide in Gaza? Dems’ “tough on the border” pivot? Breaking the rail strike? Being competent stewards of imperialism? I think liberals like to forget Blue Crimes, they are basically told to do so by mass media and it doesn’t comport with parasocially liking the sunglasses ice cream guy if you acknowledge he’s a genocidal racist. It isn’t really your fault to be in that bubble, but it is on you if you don’t seriously listen to others taking the time to explain its problems.

      Democrats took America from gays are illegal, to full gay rights with marriage.

      Absolutely wrong. Gay rights were popularized by left struggle, not struggle from Dems. Dems were dragged there by younger people that were radicalized by the people actually fighting for gay rights. Pride was a riot. The liberal assent and cooption was lagging, not leading. And in the US, gay marriage at the federal level was created by fiat of unelected lords (the Supreme Court) and not Democratic policy, despite Dems having full control of Congress and the Presidency in the neighboring period. Finally, gay rights are not full. I don’t understand why you think they would be. Gay people still face all kinds of oppressions in the US and the law only rarely protects them.

      Environmental laws have been all Democrats.

      This is simply factually incorrect. Early “environmental” laws were largely implemented by Republicans, including Teddy Roosevelt, also a racist genocidal war criminal. This was in many ways responding to muckrakers and organized labor who saw the environment, living conditions, and working conditions as inextricable.

      Nixon signed the EPA into existence.

      If Democrats did nothing, Trump wouldn’t have signed 76 executive orders reversing Biden orders on his very first day.

      Democrats don’t do nothing, they just avoid doing the vast majority of things good for humanity in general and even just the US citizen working class. Even when they promise to do so, they have an excuse and whipping boy ready to go. Oh, Ovama and the national platform said single-payer? Sorry there’s Lieberman and we can’t kill the filibuster and oh man no discipline at all. Cancel student debt? Oh sorry there’s a parliamentarian that we can just override and fire and okay we will issue a conspicuously legally weak executive order and then fold at the earliest opportunity.

      But Democrats do implement policies, they just do so in the interest of capital. Their platform represents certain formations of capital, the GOP’s some others, and they share many donors. The different formations undo each others’ work when in power. Or at least they don’t flex their muscles until something is intolerable to them.

    • sentinel@lemmitor.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      LOL no it isn’t, Trump or someone like him was an inevitability because US elections are fixed and the people who have actual power in your society, Corporate board members, want fascism.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Truth there. I’m from a dark blue area yet city government here couldn’t act any different than if I lived in a dark red state. In some ways I actually think they are worse. All they have to do is put D next to their name & the voters will support them regardless of their actions.

        • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Case in point: the consequences of Dems co-opting the George Floyd protests was tp increase cops at the expense of public services ans to then spend even more on cops because Biden gave them federal funding. They did the “tough on crime” right wing thing and this was forced into the mainstream position.

    • turnip@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Accepting gays is definitely the same as funding sex change for prisoners and sending them to a female prison, which was one of the most successful ads in history.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Correct. Not to mention the midterm congressional elections that only see ~20% turnout, and even less in the congressional primaries. The overwhelming majority are retirees, who will almost always pick the most conservative option in their party. People love to complain about term limits and appeasement centrists, but they don’t show up when they actually have a say in who represents them.

      • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Capitalists will never let you vote them out of power. The field in which politicians can operate electorally is already heavily restricted and biased by donors and a donor-focused campaign machine that is further entrenched by ever-changing thresholds for candidacy and redistricting. I encourage you to run as a principled person as a third party and see how it goes. I would encourage you to run as a Dem but the time when a politician learns they are also enemies is after they’ve already helped entrench the party. If you ran as a Dem with principles they would not help your campaign and might fight it. Once in office they’ll stymy most of what you attempt.

        Voting for every general election is just picking which of two capitalist parties will dictate policy. And the “good guys” are actually detrimental enough that they make their potential voters apathetic or opposed to thrm, as they cannot resonate with their experiences or needs. You know what folks actually need? Rent cut by 90%. Real estate is a financial legalized crime to create “passive income” for the wealthy. That would be incredibly popular. It would also be impossible for a capitalist party in the US, it is their antithesis.

        So the serious, adult question is to state what the existential problems are and then ask what solutions could be sufficient to solve them. And there is at least one thing we know well in US electoralism: just voting for Dems will never be close to enough, abd even believing it is particularly important will just keep you ans others from spending the time to work together and do enough.

  • DengistDonnieDarko [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    gotta say, I’m extremely glad .world defederated from Hexbear. viewing this thread over here is night and day from looking at it on .ml and seeing The Smartest People in The Room say "ahh, so you just support trump then, got it smuglord "

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Here is the education that you need to take over the Democratic Party:

      David Hogg, the new Vice Chair of the DNC, has allocated $20M to primary out the old appeasers, and replace them with youthful progressives to create a true opposition party.

      Democratic primaries only see ~20% turnout in congressional elections. 30/50 states have partisan primaries, meaning you must be registered as a Democrat to vote in the Democratic primary. This was a contributing factor in Bernie’s 2016 loss.

      Rather than progressives and leftists fracturing over third-parties, we need to all block vote progressives into the Democratic Party through primaries and replace the deadwood centrists that have been content with the status quo.

      Check your state’s primary type here: https://ballotpedia.org/Primary_election_types_by_state

      • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You cannot take over the Democratic Party. It will just change its own rules before you get the chance. The people running it are all feeding from the same donor trough, either as politicians or consultants. You think they will let you just take the trough away? Friend they make the party rules! They will just change them! They already did this against Bernie, an imperialist socdem, someone who isn’t even a real threat to capital (just the insurance industry) and they thwarted that even when it had momentum and kids allowed themselves hope for healthcare without poverty. This is the basic nature of capitalist parties: they are beholden to capital, not the people, and certainly not you or I.

        By the time the Democratic Partu is “taken over” by anything, it will be because it has found a way to make capital happy by adopting a policy that costs them nothing. Which means we win nothing of serious value and the spiral of capitalist degrading conditions continues.

        In the meantime, what role do these reformers actually serve? If they can’t change what needs yo change, what other effects do they have?

        Well, they mostly just convince people to have false hope for the party, delaying its need to crash and burn and be replaced, ideally with something more effective than a bourgeois electoral party.

      • sentinel@lemmitor.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This was a contributing factor in Bernie’s 2016 loss.

        I am from the Bronx. I was a registered democrat my entire life. Somehow when my wife and I went to vote in 2016, after making sure we were registered, we were turned away from the polls because “we weren’t registered”

        2 years later I started receiving the letters and was suddenly registered again.

        The reason Bernie lost in 2016 is your fucking party threw us off the rolls because of who we are and where we lived. Your fucking party stole that election. You are full of shit and it is you that is a fascist enabler by making an excuse for corruption.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          It’s not my party. I’ve been left of the Democrats since the 90s. It’s the party that more closely aligns with my values between the only two that can win a US Presidential Election.

          I believe you, and I’m sure you’re not the only one with that problem. I didn’t say it was the reason Bernie lost, because I’m fully aware of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Hillary’s collusion, but it was a contributing factor.

          I volunteered to direct foot traffic for the general election, and chatted up several other volunteers about the disappointing results of the primary. They told me that they couldn’t believe how many registered independents and no party affiliation voters they had to turn away. Apparently partisan primary requirements aren’t common knowledge, so I’m sharing this information to prevent other people from having the same experience.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            43 minutes ago

            It’s not my party

            It’s enough your party that you’re willing to do genocide denial for them

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Yup. Carville wants to preserve the “schism” between progressives and liberals. That’s how you know it’s the right move. We need to shift back the Overton window.

  • OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is a bit of an oversimplification. Actually, the Democrats deliberately run a weak campaign while Russian botfarms tell the left not to vote for the Democrats. And that’s how movement to the left is prevented.

  • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I mean… I’m not in love with the idea of “blocking movement to the left”, but I sure as fuck would take that over the freespin to the right we are on for now. Like, I get that Dem’s need to step their game way the fuck up because you don’t win elections by being the “second worst choice”… but still. If we didn’t want accelerated fascism…

    • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Blocking movement to the left is why you’re left with a rightward trend. Not just because the right itself “moves right” but because Dems’ political nature breeds false consciousness and confused disillusionment. Dems promise basic things like a student debt jubilee and then do a little weak attempt at it. So then people leave them behind. Even worse, Dems help create the degrading conditions that provokes an anti-liberal backlash (liberalism being the dominant ideology of capitalism, not just US Dems), and then Dems work their hardest to fight the associated leftward shift. But not the right: their radicals are useful for crushing that new left, as the left is anticapitalist.

      Most importantly, the bourgeoisie electoral system provides an illusion of control. You don’t actually choose the lesset evil. You just throw in a vote for candidates preselected for you by capital and the party (a party in which you have no say) who will never actually be able to fight the right or adopt anticapitalist positions, and will therefore never be left. You, and the people, are not in control in this scenario. This scenario just provides consent for what capital wanted anyways, just with two different flavors: genocidal fascism with a good PR team for the theoretically empathetic and genocidal fascism with an okay PR team for braying hogs.

    • 🏴 hamid the villain [he/him] 🏴@vegantheoryclub.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You didn’t have a choice, the economic system in the US concentrates power in the hand of people with money and they are fascists. If it wasn’t 2024 it would be 2028 after 4 years of congressional stalling. The path the US is on is predetermined, they don’t have to fix every election to the vote, they fix a percentage of them over the course of decades to push the policy to the right.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Up until the moment we have enough confirmed support for a progressive movement, status quo is a hell of a lot better than accelerated fascism; if only to buy more time to build the aforementioned progressive support. I’m all for actual leftward movement, but gambling on unconfirmed support is stupid. Even the liberals understand that, in their sports-team monkey brain.

      The left has no plan sufficient to deal with this. I hear vague rumblings about strikes and revolutions and the power of the working class united, but the working class isn’t united yet. There is no organized, validated plan to effect that revolution. There’s no leftist Project 2025. That’s a natural consequence of the commendable independence of leftists, but it has the unfortunate consequence of being tactically untenable. The right uniform under the banner of their dictator, the left squabbles about trivialities.

      It’s not that I wish it to be so; I would vastly prefer the left to have a functional plan to secure power. But it is the reality; I see neither such a plan, nor the necessary organization to implement such a plan. That’s why we vote lesser evil. We strive for the stationary phase of the ratchet to avoid the freewheeling phase, because we don’t yet have the organized strength to break the pawl from its housing.

      Once we have that organized strength, and not sooner, we can break the pawl. Sooner, and the ratchet spins freely to the right.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          A bunch of shortsighted cosplayers with no sense of praxis or political literacy protested the do-nothing Dems and we got the freewheeling fascism MAGAs. How’s that working out for you? How’s the glorious revolution coming?

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            So it’s not working then?

            But I assume you’re going to keep doing it anyway. All while continuing to accuse other people of being short sited with no sense of praxis.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Flagrant hypocrisy! This was your plan, not mine. How’s it working? Did a third party win? Did we end the genocide in Gaza yet? Don’t equate your plan’s failure with our recognition that it failed. You gambled, and this is what we get. Own it, maybe learn something about implementation.

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                Yup, looks like I was correct; you are going to keep doing it anyway, while desperately projecting your own failure onto others.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  51 minutes ago

                  Keep up the “I’m rubber you’re glue” act buddy, it’s age appropriate. I wanted Trump to lose, you wanted Harris to lose. You got your wish, this is on you. Or keep blaming everyone else who tried to warn you that it was a stupid idea, how dare they point out the glaring flaws in your strategy. Let’s see if that makes a leftist plan materialize.