• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlVery warm
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “And you, young engineer, you who dream of improving the lot of the workers by the application of science to industry - what a sad disappointment, what terrible disillusions await you! You devote the useful energy of your mind to working out the scheme of a railway which, running along the brink of precipices and burrowing into the very heart of mountains of granite, will bind together two countries which nature has separated. But once at work, you see whole regiments of workers decimated by privations and sickness in this dark tunnel - you see others of them returning home carrying with them, maybe, a few pence, and the undoubted seeds of consumption; you see human corpses - the results of a groveling greed - as landmarks along each yard of your road; and, when the railroad is finished, you see, lastly, that it becomes the highway for the artillery of an invading army…”

    Peter Kroporkin, 1880

    A hundred years later engineers are more jaded. They know what they are doing. At MIT in the 1980’s it was called “get your fingerprints on the murder weapon”.


  • For the past 50 years, Democrats have been supporting environmental protection laws and Republicans have been against them.

    It is equivalent to compare “But Nixon started the EPA” to “Lincoln ended slavery.” That Nixon started the EPA 50 years ago is irrelevant to all the following decades where Republicans have been consistently against the environment. It’s no different than when Magas say they aren’t racist because of Lincoln.

    If it’s a straight line from Nixon to Trump as you say, then why claim Republicans are environmentalists with Nixon as your example?



  • It’s also just factually wrong to say, “it was so long ago, its like saying they’re the anti-slavery party.” Nixon represents the turning point for the Republican party, where they abandoned their support for Civil Rights and embraced the Southern Strategy.

    Those two sentences are in exact conflict with each other. You say “it’s too long ago when Republicans were different” isn’t a valid argument." Then in the very next sentence you say, “it was long ago when Republicans were completely different.”

    WTF?






  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.worldtoThe Leaky Cauldron@diagonlemmy.socialNice guy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Emotionally I’m still sad she turned out rotten.

    She’s not rotten. She only not perfect.

    She hates Trump. She donates to the Labour party. She is pro women’s rights. She is pro gay rights. She is pro trans rights with one exception. She doesn’t want trans women in women’s sports.

    So there’s a long list of Left views she aligns with and one that she doesn’t. It’s indictive of leftists that everyone must meet absolute cultural purity or be evil. Meanwhile the Right will pick one thing such as hating foreigners and anyone that’s on board with that is good no matter what other ideas they also have.









  • This experience has also made me consider changing the license of Spegel, as it seems to be the only stone I can throw.

    Dude used MIT license without knowing why GPL exists, then got upset. If you use MIT, you use it because you absolutely do not care if your work is appropriated by others, especially corporations.

    It’s like he put furniture on the curb with a “free” sign on it and now is upset his stuff is being sold at an antique store.

    He has no reason to be salty because he had in effect told Microsoft to take everything and don’t give anything back. So yeah, he should change it to GPL like yesterday. GPL was created because of the problem he has now faced.